Chicago Bears Musical Chairs - Quarterback Edition
Originally this post was supposed to encompass the entire Chicago backfield, but after I started writing, I found that I had more to say about the Quarterbacks than I had originally thought I would, so I had to stop there. We'll hit up the RBs later. (and for further reference, check out Lester's Roster Turnover series This one deals with QBs. Great stuff!)
Caleb Hanie: (Kev H did a nice piece on Caleb in his 2011 Free Agency series. Check it out here) Hanie did very well in limited work this year. Well enough that he proved that he never should have lost the #2 spot when he was injured in the preseason. He should get a chance to fight for the #2......but he won't. The Bears want a veteran in this spot (Marc Bulger would be ideal, but Chad Pennington is my bet for the guy we end up with. And if Pennington can actually stay off the IR list, it's not even a bad choice), and for some reason (insulted Martz's mother, maybe?) Hanie seems to be a sore spot. Problems admitting error by the coaching staff (see any interview where the choice to keep Hanie at #3 is questioned for evidence of this. But this one probably takes the cake.) might further hinder Hanie in elevating on the depth chart. All that having been said, unless some team with a desperate need for a QB and a risk taking GM comes calling, Hanie will have a seat. The Bears will need him to bail the team out when whoever the next veteran who was better in practice throws 4 picks against the worst team in the league. Caleb has a seat.Todd Collins: I cannot see the Bears possibly wasting any more money than they have on Collins, unless of course he looks better in practice, then it might be on! Collins reportedly is considering retirement after the injury to his (pride) shoulder in the NFCCG, depending on how his MRI turned out. I don't blame Collins for the position he was in. I can't fault the guy for playing well in practice after being coaxed out of retirement by the Bears. And I won't wish career ending injury on him. But I do hope he plays somewhere else next year. Collins has no seat (or arm).
Matt Gutierrez: What can we say about Matt? His career completion percentage is 100% and a career QB rating of over 104. Of course, he threw 1 pass in 2007 as a member of the Pats and another in 2009 as a Chief. Matt is a warm body for camp, as my esteemed colleague pointed out in his piece. But unlike my colleague, I don't believe he has a chance in Hades of making the roster, due to nothing more than his lack of experience . He could end up on the PS as a scout QB, though. Matt is seatless.
Jay Cutler: Jay Cutler? Why is he even being considered? Because there is a very vocal section of members that feel Cutler is part of the problem. Now, I've had countless arguments in the threads about Jay. I've presented the facts (multiple systems, horrid line and incomplete and ineffective receiving corps) multiple times so I won't rehash this argument. But I will make a few points. First, the Bears gave away entirely too much to attain Cutler to just give up on him after a year that showed progression, development and improvement. Even if Cutler was a mistake, there is no way that the front office admits a mistake this quickly. Additionally, Cutler showed this year that he can run this type of offense and do it well, even with having to run for his life and throw to a sub-par receiving corps. Trading him at this point would be the epitome of impatience. Like it or not (and I do), Jay Cutler is here to stay. Jay has the best seat in the house.
There you have it. Collins and Gutierrez are left looking for somebody else's pine to ride. Join us next time as the Bears RBs do their best Walter Payton impressions as our next dancing Bears.
And if you missed any of the previous posts in this series, here are some handy links just for you!
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Colleague.
Colleague. Unless, you know, your old college’s buildings speak to you. But I suppose there are pills or apps to help that.
Even though this one went as most of us probably predicted, well done.
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 22, 2011 9:11 PM CST reply actions
thanks, buddy....
It was very late for me. corrected.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 23, 2011 2:59 AM CST up reply actions
Hey Tim!
You insist on putting so much crap in parentheses that it’s really hard trying to follow the point of your article :(
pbanachi
I think you are the only one having a hard time...
In fact, I have to give a big shout out to Tim as now one of my favorite writers on here. Each writer has a style and his just seems to work for me. As for “putting so much crap” in the parentheses, I couldn’t agree more. He uses them as sort of a “side note” that inputs his opinion of joke or to breifly expand on a topic.
Its not his fault you have trouble reading.
And the point of the article is as straight-forward as you can get. Musical chairs, who has a seat and who doesn’t (a metaphor for who will likely be staying with the team and who won’t).
by I Have Bearsititis on Feb 23, 2011 11:20 AM CST up reply actions
Hey Tim (regardless of what anyone((I mean what do I know)) else says) I think this was pretty good.
I especially liked
Problems admitting error by the coaching stafffollowed by your link. Not to dredge up any past complaints by yours truly, but this exemplifies why Lovie is unfit to handle the media. “Um, err. I believe I answered your question by refusing to directly address it. Which means it will be addressed at a time when such things can be considered addressed by my coaching staff and myself upon evaluating your question and our subsequent evaluation of the way we addressed said question. Am I clear?”
If you can't laugh at yourself you must not be very funny.
That Lovie interview was pretty pathetic
This is typical if Lovie made the decision, but assuming that Martz wrote the QB depth chart and Lovie signed off on it, is Martz really that bad at evaluating talent?
“Man, that guy Collins sure can hold a clipboard. Suit him up!”
by NorthSideBearsFan on Feb 23, 2011 12:23 PM CST up reply actions
Everyone on this site sure is quick to jump on people for syntax and other grammatical errors. It is clear you understand what is trying to be communicated. I highly doubt many (but not all) critics know any more than they learned in high school or English 101, so what is wrong wifh ah phew masteaks erry know und egin€?
by Minds_Eye024 on Feb 22, 2011 11:59 PM CST via mobile reply actions
That's because most of us are joking around and he gets that. :)
But just for you, “… what is wrong with a few mistakes every now and again?”
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 23, 2011 7:36 AM CST up reply actions
Auw come on guys
I’m not the sharpest knife in the drawer. Show a little love and keep it simple :)
pbanachi
In all seriousness...
I think Hanie showed enough to warrant a backup job, but I’ll be very surprised if anyone comes knocking offering him a starting role. It’s not like the Cassel situation at all.
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 23, 2011 7:41 AM CST reply actions
Hanie needs to really buckle down this offseason with the playbook
then go into the OTAs and show the Bears he can be the #2 guy
If you go in the bathroom, turn off the lights, and say "Da Coach" 5 times while facing the mirror... Ditka will appear and slap the wussy right out of you.
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 23, 2011 8:33 AM CST up reply actions
God, I hope he does.
I liked Hanie befrore this season and wanted to see him in the #2 spot before all this went down. And I feel the same way this offseason, only more so.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 23, 2011 2:46 PM CST up reply actions
Does this season
make Hanie a “guy who knows the system?” Hence, Martz’ll like him?
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 23, 2011 2:52 PM CST up reply actions
God, I hope so.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 23, 2011 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
From a logical standpoint, I couldn't agree more, but.....
Not every GM/Owner in the league is logical (or sane). I don’t expect anyone to come calling, but an Al Davis or Dan Snyder or even a Bill Bidwell if things don’t go his way with Kolb or the several other QBs rumored to be in his sites wouldn’t surprise me, either. Dumber moves have been made.
As for Hanie showing he should be #2, I agree, but then, dumber moves have been made……last season. And they think they did the right thing, so why would they then change?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 23, 2011 2:44 PM CST up reply actions
If logic has no place in the Bears,
well, um, why the hell are you and I here?
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 23, 2011 2:51 PM CST up reply actions
Chicken or egg?
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 23, 2011 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
Fried and scrambled.
With a side of Hanie at backup.
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 23, 2011 4:40 PM CST up reply actions
Concussed....
with home fries and ketchup.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on Feb 23, 2011 5:35 PM CST up reply actions
QB
I think Hanie played well enough to be #2 next year. No one on the FA list impresses me either and I think Hanie would be a better option regardless. Hopefully Cutler stays healthy and the OL gets a boost in the draft this spring.

by 























