Analyzing The Enemy: The Detroit Lions 2011 Draft
Welcome back, Bears faithful. Monday and Wednesday, we looked at the Packers 2011 draft class. Today, we'll take a peek at the newest members of the Detroit Lions. Follow me to the clearing at the end of the jump and we'll glare into the eyes of the enemy together......
The Lions only picked five players in this years draft. And the Lions made the most of them. Check out this haul...
In the first round, the Lions managed to nab one-time projected first overall pick Nick Fairley of Auburn. The 6'4" 291 lb defensive tackle is brutal. Against the pass, he has non-stop hands, more moves than Micheal Jackson and he's as explosive as they come. And he's equally adept against the run. The guy has virtually no flaws in his physical game. But.....he has a reputation as an asshat. His attitude is a huge concern and he has problems keeping his emotions in check. And his work ethic leaves a lot to be desired. The Lions might have gotten the best player in the draft. Or they might have gotten the worst bust. If just a little of Ndamukong Suh's work ethic and stability can rub off on Fairley, the Lions will have the absolute best defensive tackle combo in the league. But with Fairley's attitude, that is a big "if". Still, there is no way that the Lions could pass on the possibilities, and I give this pick an A+.
The first player the Lions grabbed in the second round was Boise St wide receiver Titus Young. The 5'11" 174 lb wide-out is best suited as a slot receiver. He has explosive quickness and can make people miss. He is fantastic at losing coverage in underneath routes and has decent speed to get away from defenders. Size is really his biggest problem, as he is a very slim receiver and doesn't have the bulk or strength to attack for the ball. Some time in the weight room will help Young quite a bit. He's got a ton of upside, and not a lot of negatives, but I'm not sure that Young will be able to overcome the size issues at this level. He will also give the Lions a good option as a return man, though. Overall, I'd give this pick a B.
The second choice the Lions made in the second round was Illinois RB Mikel Leshoure. Leshoure looks like the Lions idea of "Thunder" to Jahvid Best's "Lightning". With a 4.56 40 time, Mikel isn't the fastest RB in the draft, but he does have a great burst and good quickness for a big back. He does a good job of breaking tackles and pushing the pile. Mikel has better agility than you would expect from a back his size. He's also an adequate pass blocker and receiver out of the backfield. He does need to work on his vision and making quicker decision, as he tends to dance a bit in the backfield. I think this was a very good pickup for the Pride, and should give Detroit a good 1-2 punch for years to come as well as helping Detroit in short yardage situations. I give this pick an A-.
The Lions didn't pick again until the 5th round, and I really was confused by this selection: Douglas Hogue, LB from Syracuse. I honestly think this was a stinker of a pick. Hogue wasn't the best LB left on the board at the time, and he wasn't even close. He has decent lateral agility and good speed. He also has a good backpedal when in coverage, and has good burst. That being said, his strength is lacking, severely. As is his overall agility. He posted the worst Bench for LBs at the combine (18), the worst 20 yard shuttle (4.57). I'm not a big combine guy, don't get me wrong. And combine numbers should not be used as a determining factor in drafting, IMO. But the physical failures highlight issues that were already known. The exclamation point, if you will. The laundry list of his negatives reads like this: Poor at reading and reacting, plays too high, poor instincts, gets pushed around by blockers in run support, has problems disengaging blocker, takes poor angles to the ball carrier and misses too many tackles. Hogue isn't a horrible physical specimen, but his speed and his few positives just don't add up to a fifth round selection, IMO, or even a 7th round selection. I give this pick an F
The final selection for the Lions was 7th round pickup Johnny Culbreath. Culbreath is a mammoth tackle (6'5" 325 lbs) from South Carolina State that saw his stock raising him onto the draft boards late. He had an outstanding pro day and that put him on the draft radar. He was the 2009 MEAC Offensive Linemen of the Year. I haven't been able to find a whole lot about the guy, to be honest. But what I have found says that he's a raw talent with great physical ability and huge holes in his technique. Sounds like a 7th round tackle selection, to me. I'll give it a C.
Despite the mind-boggling pick in the 5th, I think the Lions had a damned good draft. I know a lot of people thought they should have addressed the corner position in the top rounds, but I am a subscriber to the theory that if you improve the defensive line, you improve the secondary, and the Lions certainly did that. They drafted BPA, and I will never deduct points for that. The Hogue pick being the lone factor against them, I give the Lions overall draft an A-.
Let's have it, ladies and gentlemen! What are your thoughts on the Detroit Lions 2011 draft class?
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
if i remember correctly...
the open threads were filled with comments about cutler’s and rodgers’ respective health after the Lions picked Fairley. And with good reason. Not sure many people still have “Detroit Kitties” in their vocabulary…
Bah, we had faith that Jerry would add to the Carimi pick by adding some beefy mid-round talent to our interior line, so we’re not reliant on developing the current pool of 7th rounders and undrafted free agents.
Acreman20: 127 hours is pretty decent.
awfullyquiet: How long is that movie?
Acreman20: 93 minutes.
I think it all hinges on Stafford...
If stafford can stay healthy, I like the Lions to compete for the division. If not, then they compete for last place.
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on May 6, 2011 4:04 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions
eh
i still don’t think they’re ready yet to compete for the division, however i do believe they will play protagonist and be an annoying little thorn in the side of both the packers and the bears
I'll roll up
The Fact That The Lions Didn't Draft An O Lineman
till the 7th round means that their offensive line problems will continue because they haven’t addressed the fact that Matt Stafford gets hurt all the time. This boads well for the Bears, I think.
Well, you see guys
Martin Mayhew inherited a 0-16 in 2009 when he became the permanent GM in Detroit. The Lions were plain awful from 2001-2008 and in the 3 offseasons he transformed this team into a team that is looking like a winner. Obviously, they haven’t accomplished their goal making the playoffs and beyond yet, but now the Detroit Lions have an identity and the potential to be a pretty good team.
The Lions were 6th best pass protection for offensive last year and was 3rd in attempts per game. They have a couple decent guys on that line, not household names or anything, but they aren’t horrible. Backus has came into his own last year despite much criticism and the new LG addition Rob Sims has been outstanding. The line is at least good in pass protection so Stafford should be fine as long as Peppers don’t slam him to the ground on his shoulder! The guy just had some really bad luck with huge d-lineman slamming him on those shoulders.
As far as being a contender, I think they need a good free agent signing or two for depth along the linebacker and corner positions, and maybe offensive line. But I don’t believe that they are too far off from making the playoffs. If Stafford stays healthy with the type of talent they have at the skill positions and the defensive line, it’s a very good possibility that the Lions will a lot better than some may anticipate.
I’ve seen so many games last year where they probably should’ve and could’ve won, but at the last moment they would let it slip. At the end of the season it seemed like they really started to figure out their mistakes from the past and strung along an impressive 4 game winning streak.
Things are definitely looking up for the Detroit Lions in 2011.
From 0-16 to the Superbowl baby!
It wouldn't surprise me
if there are three NFC North teams in the playoffs next year. I not saying it’s gonna happen, but it wouldn’t surprise me.
It would be interesting.
It’s not often that you see that, but I do believe 3 teams could be play-off caliber next year at least.
I'm not happy with where all the Illini went...
1. LeShoure goes to the Lions who I respect but when it comes game time, I can never root for them.
2. Liuget goes to the Chargers who are my least favorite team in the NFL. Most of the hatred comes from Phillip “Crybaby” Rivers, but unfortunately I can’t root for them either.
3. Lastly, Wilson and Bussey both go to the Saints. I was hoping Bussey would get drafted and I’m happy for him that he gets to go with Martez (both could be very good players), but, I think the whole “underdog” New Orleans stories from couple of years ago made me not a fan. Naturally, I like Brees and think Payton is a great coach but I just can’t find myself rooting for them either.
I hope each of those guys plays hard and has a great career, but not against the Bears or if it adversly affects the Bears in any way, shape or form. (For example, I would love for LeShoure to run for 200+ and 3 TD’s next year to pull an upset of the Pack, knocking them out of the playoffs while securing our NFC North lead.)
by I Have Bearsititis on May 6, 2011 10:53 AM CDT reply actions
This is not the same Lions front office that built that 0-16 team.
The Lions are becoming scary. Their new GM and head coach seem to work well together.
I look for Schwartz to be on of the top NFL coaches some day. I’m a die hard Bears fan but you have to admire whats happening in Detroit.
About Doug Hogue
he’s a converted running back whos only been playing LBer for 2 years. The Lions coaches like the developemental athletic upside he has. He could develop into a good LB or at worst be a good ST player
"The right (draft) move sometimes might be to strengthen a strength. Filling holes in the 1st round leads to grabs and busts." - Steve_Chiefs.
what really gets me
Is the Minnesota picks in round 1 and 2. I mean, Christian Ponder? A west coast qb that fits the scheme but I could see him slipping to them in the 2nd honestly. Kyle Rudolf is a good tight end, but to pass up Titus Young and Torrey Smith when u only have 1 good receiver on the team seems foolish.
I’m not at all sold on Ponder and think that in this division he will get killed if he starts as a rookie. I can’t really see Minnesota doing any better than 3rd place with a rookie qb and only 1 receiver. They better hope A.P don’t get hurt!
From 0-16 to the Superbowl baby!
by DLions4Eva on May 6, 2011 1:47 PM CDT via mobile reply actions
then again
St Louis almost made the playoffs with a rookie qb and NO receivers so maybe Minne might be better than expected. I mean they do got talent and were division champs only 2 seasons ago. They better hope A.P don’t get hurt!
From 0-16 to the Superbowl baby!
by DLions4Eva on May 6, 2011 1:50 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions
Considering this isn't the Minny post...
Stay tuned for Tim to cover that one.
Weekend contributor at Windy City Gridiron
by Steven Schweickert on May 6, 2011 2:11 PM CDT up reply actions
Coming up next week, as a matter of fact!
in•san•i•ty \in-ˈsa-nə-tē\ noun
1 : The practice of repeating the same action while expecting different results.
by Timothy Hockemeyer on May 7, 2011 7:36 AM CDT up reply actions
3rd Place Where
The NFC West?, I can’t see the Bears, Packers, or Lions doing that bad.
Green Bay Packers- Super Bowl 45 Champions, Way to make Lambeau and Lombardi Proud
I think Detroit could have had an even better draft class
What if they had taken amukamara in rd 1 and then Austin in 2? Would they have been better off instead of fairly and a wr? Then the leshoure pick was great. Back 7 is bad without significant FA pick ups. I agree with TT that a great front four makes the secondary better but it can’t cover up that much. But they definitely added some talented players in the first three rounds.
We are serving up Carimi Pancakes!!
I disagree
Amukamara pass defense stats amount to a #2 corner in the NFL. He gives up way too many big plays to better receivers and isn’t nearly as physical as Jim Schwartz would prefer. The main reason they didn’t draft him and why he slipped to #19 is that he lacks the elite ball skills that is needed to cover a Calvin Johnson or any superior receiver in the NFL.
Fairley has top-5 talent and slipped to them at #13. It was kind of a no brainer to draft him, as well as Titus Young and Mikel Le Shoure. All 3 will contribute their rookie season.Corners generally take 2-3 seasons to get really good.
From 0-16 to the Superbowl baby!
by DLions4Eva on May 7, 2011 9:05 AM CDT via mobile up reply actions

by 



















