Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Decisions Await New Bears GM on Draft Day

The Bears finally have their man in Phil Emery. A scout with 31 years of football experience, Emery should feel completely at home in the team's War Room on draft day. That would certainly be a welcome change for an organisation seemingly intent on putting it's worst foot forward each April. From colossal first round busts like Cedric Benson and Michael Haynes, to head-scratching experiments like Dan Bauzin and Jarron Gilbert, to the botched trade with the Baltimore Ravens in 2011, the job orchestrated by Chicago’s front office left a lengthy trail of embarrassment for team and players alike. Emery, by all accounts an extremely hardworking blue-collar type, not unlike the Packers’ Ted Thompson, has been asked to fix that. And, while the team's proviso-laden approach left many doubting the appeal Chicago would hold as a destination for would-be-GM's, the gig could turn out to be one of the better ones in the league.

Star-divide

The Chicago Bears are not a sinking ship inasmuch as one blown off-course, albeit sometimes rather severely. The club is still, after all, only one year removed from the NFC Championship game and were well on their way to securing a second straight playoff berth before a series of disastrous injuries brought their season to a screeching and unceremonious halt. Emery, therefore, inherits a group with an excellent core upon which to build. His new team is being delivered to his doorstep complete with franchise quarterback, elite running back, top special teams unit, Hall of Fame kick returner and a savvy, veteran defense. For better or worse, his coach (and, therefore, his system) are already in place and his coaching staff is largely set. Essentially, all Emery has to do is sift through the boxes, fit the final few pieces into the puzzle, and hope the resulting picture ends up looking stellar.

Where he finds those pieces, however, is yet to be determined. Jerry Angelo, driven in part by necessity, acquired the majority of his impact players through free agency and a single blockbuster trade. Emery will undoubtedly be asked to do a better job of acquiring players through the draft; however, inasmuch as he has the resume to do this, his window of opportunity is severely limited. The Bears don’t need a lot of help, but the help they do need was needed yesterday. To my mind, this situation severely affects the Bears’ draft strategy, as the “best player available” may simply not be one that can provide immediate help. For all the Bears’ positives, Emery will nevertheless need to make some difficult - and successful - decisions on draft day.

Wide Receiver: The Consensus Pick

At this point, the vast majority of mock drafts have Chicago taking a wide receiver with the first over all pick. I have expressed this opinion before, but I am decidedly against this move for two reasons. First, the bust potential of wide receivers taken early is extraordinarily high and the Bears can ill-afford another wasted pick. In the 2012 class, only one receiver, Oklahoma State’s Justin Blackmon, has established himself as a near “sure thing”. At this point, the only other receivers with likely first round potential are South Carolina’s Ashlon Jeffrey and Notre Dame’s Michael Floyd. Both have the size that the Bears are looking for; however Jeffrey has struggled with weight problems, a potentially disastrous flaw for a receiver who needs to beat lightning-fast NFL cornerbacks. Floyd has obvious character concerns, having been cited for underage drinking his freshman year and a DUI prior to last season, resulting in a suspension from the team. Make no mistake - the Chicago Bears need help at the wide receiver position. Were I Phil Emery, however, I would not be ready to stake the success of my offense on either of those two players.

The second reason that I’m averse to using the 19th pick on a wide receiver is simply that quality wideouts can nearly always be found via free agency; whereas franchise offensive lineman and quality 4-3 ends rarely hit the open market. This year’s free agent class boasts such names as Vincent Jackson, Deshawn Jackson, Reggie Wayne, Wes Welker, Dwayne Bowe, and Marques Colston, all Pro Bowl quality players. Acquiring a wide receiver at the beginning free agency allows the Bears to focus on other, more challenging areas of need via the draft.

Left Tackle: The Elephant in the Room

I don’t make mock drafts because, quite simply, one wrong pick can throw off the entire mock. Instead, I like to project the most reasonable (or most enticing) scenarios that my team could undertake. My approach to the 2012 draft is simple: address the area of greatest need, whose position is most difficult to address by any other means. For the Bears, that would be Left Tackle. Unfortunately for Chicago, they draft 19th and it’s difficult to find a LT caliber player at that spot. If the team is serious enough about upgrading the position - as well they should be - a trade up into the first 10 or 12 picks must be considered. Chicago will likely have to give up more than it would prefer to land a spot there, but solidifying the most important position on offensive line could well be worth it.

After seeing the Twitter-based bromance of Jay Cutler and Brandon Marshall, I couldn’t help but notice that Miami owns the 8th pick in the draft. An ideal scenario, at least for Chicago, could involve the Bears offering a bevy of picks in the hopes of prying away both Brandon Marshall and the Dolphins’ pick, which could then be used on Iowa’s Riley Reiff or Stanford’s Jonathan Martin. Generally, it’s a bad idea to give up the farm in a single move; however, such a situation would be unique in that it plugs two enormous holes at once. I don’t see Miami giving up Marshall at this point, but in the NFL, anything can certainly happen.

Another, perhaps more likely option, is for the Bears to select Ohio State’s Mike Adams, which could involve a trade back. Adams was initially pegged as a second round pick, but strong combine showings have some prognosticators moving him into the late first. On paper, he’s got tremendous upside and the size that Mike Tice covets in his lineman. Trading back a few spots may also allow the Bears to address another area of need - Tight End.

Tight End: The Dark Horse

I’ve taken some flack on message boards for suggesting the Bears address the tight end position early in the draft, but I think my logic is sound. A quick glance at the recent playoffs provides empirical evidence at how drastically a tight end can change a team’s fortunes. Given this, I would not be the least bit surprised to see a premium placed on that position in this year’s draft. The Bears have few options here, as the free agent market for dynamic, playmaking tight ends is shallow and the players on their current roster can hardly be described as such. It would undoubtedly require a bit of jockeying, but I think Clemson’s Dwayne Allen could be a very solid move for Chicago. On paper, Allen has the size and speed ratio to create the types of mismatches that Jay Cutler needs to keep the chains moving. Significantly, however, Allen has a good build and is described by many scouts as being an excellent run blocker, meaning he completely fits the system that Mike Tice wants to run. I wouldn’t compare him to Rob Gronkowski, but if the above prove to be true, Allen could have a very successful career in Chicago.

Defensive End: First Runner Up

Among the choices Emery will have to make is whether to invest primarily in the offense or defense, at least initially. We all know what Jerry Angelo’s solution to the problem was and it yielded an unhappy quarterback with a lot of wasted opportunities. The smart move, in my opinion, is to complete the offense while the team is still in a prime position to do so. While the Bears will probably always be a defensive-minded team, the Packers, Patriots, and even the Saints all proved this season that a team can succeed by leaning solely on the points side of the ball. However, no one will deny that the defense is ageing and defensive end is a position that could help the team both now and in the future. If the Bears stick with the 19th pick, there’s a chance they could land Illinois’ Whitney Mercilus or South Carolina’s Melvin Ingram. Those would likely be solid, though perhaps not spectacular picks. Given the ages of Briggs and Urlacher, they could also go with a linebacker here, assuming they found someone who fit their system; however, for him to contribute immediately, he would need to have the ability to play outside and the skills to unseat current starter Nick Roach. The Bears currently get solid play out of their linebacking corps, so if they chose to address that position, they are more likely to draft for depth than need.

This FanPost was written by a Windy City Gridiron member, and does not necessarily reflect the ideas or opinions of its staff or community.

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

While I think WR...

is the biggest need, 2 things weigh against the Bears picking one with #19:
1. There is not likely an impact WR that will be available at #19
and/or
2. A FA WR is a better solution as any said FA would be able to step in day one and be “he guy” almost immediately.

Also, a WR project with one of the 2nd or 3rd round picks might work out better.

Next, I do see DE and/or OT as the best investments this year (with a TE or NT as a dark horse). A kid like Adams at OT or Ingram at DE would be a smart move. Personally, I would like to see the Bears invest more on FAs for the offense and draftees on the defense , if for no other reason to get some development guys who can learn from the vast talent the Bears defense currently has. If a decent G/C prospect slips to the late second round, that might be worth a shot, but the Bears need a T more than a G at this point.

A CB should be found in the 3rd round and in FA to add to the mix. After that, get some depth at positions of strength but age, like LB or RB or even FB. Gonna be interesting to see how Emery handles his first and likely most important draft.

There's a fine line between stupid...and clever!

by LostInSTL on Jan 29, 2012 4:02 PM CST reply actions  

Actually bro..

There are plenty of “impact” WR’s that will be available at #19..

Kendall Wright, Mike Floyd, Alshon Jeffery

and even in rounds 2-4 you can find impact WRs

AJ Jenkins, Chris Givens, Juron Criner, Tommy Streeter, Dwight Jones

This draft is full of WRs who aren’t really considered “projects” and can come in and contribute right away, however I do believe the Bears should nab a big name Wr in FA, preferably bowe or DJax

"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders

It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!

~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders

At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool

by suckmyditka on Jan 30, 2012 12:38 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm not sure you can guarantee that...

Wright, Floyd or Jeffery will be available, but WRs are so boom or bust as compared to OTs and DTs. It would be better for the Bears to get their “answer” at WR in FA and then go get a solid project guy at WR in the 2nd round. If the Bears were picking top 10, I’d be more inclined to agree about getting a WR, still I agree that WR is fairly deep in this draft. Therefore, I’d rather the Bears get a WR in the 2nd or 3rd round that has upside. I think the Bears can improve other positions that will pay off better in the long run if they defer the WRs until later in the draft.

There's a fine line between stupid...and clever!

by LostInSTL on Jan 30, 2012 6:28 PM CST up reply actions  

All of those WRs come with serious questions

free agency is the way to solve the WR problem, not the draft

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jan 31, 2012 7:53 AM CST up reply actions  

true that, but the priority is win now

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Feb 1, 2012 7:36 AM CST up reply actions  

This draft is full of WRs who aren’t really considered "projects" and can come in and contribute right away, however I do believe the Bears should nab a big name Wr in FA, preferably bowe or DJax

"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders

It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!

~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders

At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool

by suckmyditka on Jan 31, 2012 12:11 PM CST up reply actions  

he guy = "the guy"...

edit fail!

There's a fine line between stupid...and clever!

by LostInSTL on Jan 29, 2012 4:03 PM CST reply actions  

Brandon Lloyd

Bearsh!tt!n It ain't obscene- I'm a Bears fan that likes hittin and exclamation points.

by Bearsh!tt!n on Jan 29, 2012 7:01 PM CST up reply actions  

I thought we were naming

WR’s that could potentially be awesome for the Bears, but in reality would probably be terrible investments.

Bearsh!tt!n It ain't obscene- I'm a Bears fan that likes hittin and exclamation points.

by Bearsh!tt!n on Jan 29, 2012 9:19 PM CST up reply actions  

that is what it looks like

I always turn to the sports section first. The sports page records people's accomplishments; the front page has nothing but man's failures.
~Earl Warren

by lookingdeadred on Jan 30, 2012 10:28 AM CST up reply actions  

Sorry man but with the exception of the WR issue. I have to disagree on the rest.

2. Riley Reiff and John Martin would not even be close to worth the trade. Marshall most likely is staying in Miami and newly aquired Philbin will not trade his top Playmaker to his old rival unless its really worth it. After the Senior Bowl, Adams might even be gone before our pick. Nice idea though, just dont think it will happen.

3.I agree we need a TE, but I wouldnt draft one in the first round unless we traded down. Allen is valued around the end of the first round. I would rather wait and get a TE in the mid rounds that could still be a playmaker.

4.DE would be a fine pick here but Mercilus should not be the pick. Curry should

Wouldnt it be funny if we had another DE with the last name Salters!

by fortefan09 on Jan 29, 2012 4:42 PM CST reply actions  

Ingram or Upshaw

not Curry.

"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders

It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!

~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders

At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool

by suckmyditka on Jan 30, 2012 12:41 PM CST up reply actions  

This is just not true
The second reason that I’m averse to using the 19th pick on a wide receiver is simply that quality wideouts can nearly always be found via free agency; whereas franchise offensive lineman and quality 4-3 ends rarely hit the open market.

I can’t name many #1 WRs who were signed through free agency. Apart from the talented crazies (Moss, TO, and to a lesser degree Antonio Bryant, BLloyd), the rest of the recent crop has been washed up guys like Boldin, Housh, Muhsin, Looking at the top WRs of 2011, the top free agent acquisitions are Nate Washington, Lloyd, Gaffney, Boldin, Laurent Robinson. These aren’t exactly clear #1s.

And it’s routine for a handful of unheralded DE/OL free agent pickups to surprise with elite years. This year, Mark Anderson, Andre Carter, Jason Babin, and Matt Roth had big years. And that doesn’t include true franchise pickups like Jared Allen and Julius Peppers. At OL, pickups Evan Mathis, Brian Waters, Jake Scott, Jared Gaither had big years for their new teams.

by YaoPau on Jan 30, 2012 3:10 PM CST reply actions  

As far as the tight end position goes

With Martz now gone, I agree, this position should definately be re-evaluated and prioritized accordingly. We just have so many other needs like WR, OT, DE, CB, LB that it’s hard to figure out where TE now fits into the mix of top priorities.

by JimmyMack on Jan 30, 2012 4:07 PM CST reply actions  

With so many needs

and Forte contract issues maybe offer him up and try for a Herschel Walker type deal with a desperate team. While one very talented person is hard to part with, multiple quality players can quickly bring us back. I would call this a hail mary type play, but a safe play by any means.

by GHCF2314 on Jan 30, 2012 9:49 PM CST reply actions  

Lets see trade away 50% of our offense ??? No thanks .

" Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth. " ~
Mike Tyson

by MidWayMonster54 on Jan 31, 2012 12:05 AM CST up reply actions  

If some GM is foolish enough

To give us an opportunity to pull off “The Great Train Robbery II,” then we would be crazy not to utilize Forte to improve the club, overall. That said, I highly doubt that we’ll be so fortunate, and will end up franchising (and eventually signing) Forte.

by JimmyMack on Feb 3, 2012 11:57 AM CST up reply actions  

Forget WR, draft for the O-Line...

You can sign WR’s in free agency. But you can rarely, if ever, get a good O-Lineman through free agency. They have got to fix the line, and the only way to do it is through the draft. For that reason, I really hope they take the best available O-lineman in round 1, even if that ends up being an OG like David DeCastro or a C like Peter Konz. They have got to find some true answers at those positions, and stop accepting stopgap choices like moving Williams in from LT to play Guard, or moving Spencer over from C.

By all means, if there’s a LT on the board that would be a better player than one of those guys, go for it and call yourself lucky. But if you’re looking at the 5th or 6th best OT in the draft versus the #1 Guard or Center – in other words, what we did when we picked Chris Williams, versus what the Steelers did when they drafted Alan Faneca at # 26 or what the Seahawks did by taking Steve Hutchinson at # 17 – I’ll take the best player at a “less important” position every time.

Those are pretty high benchmarks to shoot for, but lots of people are talking about DeCastro as a potential All-Pro Guard. Put him in the mix, and it immediately makes you much better off than you’d be by taking the 6th best LT only to find out that he’s not an upgrade over Webb or Williams anyway.

Then go out and spend some of that McCaskey money on Dwayne Bowe if you want to get a # 1 receiver.

by Orval Overall on Jan 31, 2012 12:54 PM CST reply actions  

Love the format here. Thanks for resisting the mock-fest.

I kind of get tired of the “We need a ______ in the first round and just get a playmaking ______ in round 2 or 3. _______ is much more valuable than a ______ .”

Drafting the best player available at a position that is at least not log-jammed has seamed like the best draft strategy for the most successful teams. I mean, if (for example) Trent Richardson miraculously falls to #19, do you pass him up because he’s not a “need” position? I’d be far more interested in who is the better player. Period.

Seriously, who is the best? I don’t care if you think the Bears can get a _ in free agency. If the scouts think Jeffrey or Wright or Floyd are going to be game changing, play making WRs, then why wouldn’t you pull the trigger?

I’m far more interested in ranking the players that may be on the Bears radar. Ingram vs Jeffrey, Adams vs Upshaw, Burflict vs Floyd, Konz vs Hightower.

I honestly would be taken aback if Emery evaluated our O-Line and found that there’s no combination of Garza, Spencer, Louis, and Williams that would be worth starting at the opening game. That being said, if Konz or DeCastro are that much better than any other player available, then you have to trust the front office to take the less pressing need.

"If the good Lord had wanted us to play soccer, he wouldn't have given us arms." - Mike Ditka

by TheAwesomeMachine on Jan 31, 2012 8:36 PM CST reply actions  

I honestly would be taken aback if Emery evaluated our O-Line and found that there’s no combination of Garza, Spencer, Louis, and Williams that would be worth starting at the opening game.

You left out Carimi, but ignoring that, do you really think the talent level on the offensive line is acceptable? If it isn’t talent, how do you explain the ridiculous sack rate or the number of stuffed runs? (Martz deserves some of the blame, but the Bears line performed decidedly worse for Martz than for the 49ers or the Lions, and this includes Lovie and Tice forcing Martz to balance the offense.)

by BusterK on Feb 1, 2012 12:47 PM CST up reply actions  

Sorry for the miscommunication

I was attempting to note the depth in the interior O-Line, thinking that there might be some combo of those 4 players that could produce a solid season of run and pass blocking from guard to guard. I in no way think that Webb should still be a starting LT in the NFL. Giving up 2.5 sacks in one game, even if it is to Jared Allen, is unacceptable. The Bears are paper-thin at tackle after Carimi. Almost any tackle the Bears could bring in should immediately compete for a starting position.

"If the good Lord had wanted us to play soccer, he wouldn't have given us arms." - Mike Ditka

by TheAwesomeMachine on Feb 1, 2012 1:18 PM CST up reply actions  

The problem with that

Is that they’re drafting at # 19. When someone projects as a capable Left Tackle, they almost always go somewhere in the top 10 or 15 picks, such as 2008, the year we drafted Chris Williams. The results of that draft show that Miami got a good player picking # 1 (Jake Long), as did Denver picking # 12 (Ryan Clady), and although SIX other teams picked tackles in the first round of the draft, only one of them would arguably be an upgrade for us (Branden Albert, who the Chiefs took at # 15).

We know the guy we took at # 14 (Williams) is not an upgrade because Webb beat him out and has outplayed him. Equally bad are Gosder Cherilous (# 17), Jeff Otah (# 19), Sam Baker (# 21), and Duane Brown (#26). So if you could go back in time, what would you do? Would you still grab whoever the best tackle available was at # 19, as the Panthers did? That’s what this team is facing.

by Orval Overall on Feb 1, 2012 2:30 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm no talent evaluator

but I have yet to see Webb actually outplay anyone. Williams got hurt to lose his job, and Tice seemed to be tired of the musical chairs act so he plugged Williams in at Guard instead of Tackle…they road Webb mostly based on potential, potential he rarely delivers on based on measurables that haven’t helped him stop an edge rusher yet in his career.

I am in the small minority that really thinks we gave up on Williams at Tackle way too fast. I have seen no one play better at LT since his injury-based demotion, and our line could have used his middling-average LT play this past season…Which isn’t a ringing endorsement, but if it was obvious, it would have happened.

"just as Gary Fencik will go down as the last person to catch a Joe Namath pass, Wootton will be remembered in NFL history as the last player to sack Brett Favre." - John "Moon" Mullin

by Brendan Hess on Feb 1, 2012 9:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Our interior guys are decent....

but the fact that it is some combination, and we don’t know what, means that they are all probably in mid-average range. If any one of them was a real standout or talent, we would know “this guy at this spot” and no one would question it. No one wonders where Nicks, Mankins, etc. are going to play at. It was never “some combination” with Kreutz…Our interior is decidedly less bad than our LT spot, but that does not equal good enough to ignore in drafts. If you can put someone you feel is an impact starter with star potential going forward at any position on our line but RT, you do it…and that’s just giving Carimi a second year of the benefit of the doubt.

"just as Gary Fencik will go down as the last person to catch a Joe Namath pass, Wootton will be remembered in NFL history as the last player to sack Brett Favre." - John "Moon" Mullin

by Brendan Hess on Feb 1, 2012 9:46 PM CST up reply actions  

BPA

i like that form of strategy were we pick best player available. reason, we have a lot of needs now and in the near future. looks like this way is a win win situ

by stepeo on Feb 1, 2012 5:45 AM CST reply actions  

Cutler does not have ANYONE to throw to.

Receivers can take time to be effective so I would take Floyd and nab a receiver like Meachem, Wayne, or Holmes and bolster our WR corps.

Tom Brady. Nuff said.

by Cub Style on Feb 7, 2012 10:13 AM CST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Windy City Gridiron is the best independent site on the internet for breaking news, in-depth analysis, and hardcore discussion about the Chicago Bears

Community Guidelines

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Images-8_small
Why the Offensive Line will be fine.

Recent FanPosts

029_small
Solving a Crisis: Redzone Edition
Windycityflyer_small
SMD's Bottom 5
Images-8_small
Yahoo Fantasy Football Sign-up. Need contact info soon
Small
We may not know DT Nate Collins but the Chicago Bears do.
029_small
Is it time for a contract? Oh no, not another Matt Forte post...
Burlacher2_small
Is Winning Games a Specialty?
Burlacher2_small
Apparently, Defense Wins Championships...
Fox_small
Bad start for AJ Jenkins
Burlacher2_small
What's It Take to Win?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Windycity_small Adam T

189886_210123485665309_100000029768895_888721_5830650_n__1__small Dane Noble

Editors

Sackwatchcutler_small Lester A. Wiltfong Jr.

535321_3734130120778_1501804679_3253247_588486681_n_small David Taylor

Orange_shy_guy_small Steven Schweickert

Capture_small Kev H

Contributing Writers

Lincoln_small Sam Householder

Leprechaun_small Spongie

Polishsausage_small Steve Ronkowski

Icothgmts_small T.J. Shouse

Joe_20mantegna-bill_20swerski_small Superfans

P981d5c2_reasonably_small_small DaveGilbertNFL