Could the concussion crisis lead to the demise of football?
Everyone knows that over the last couple of seasons the focus on concussions has been greatly increased. We've seen a few ex-players die young, many with a strange, somewhat unknown disease called "chronic traumatic encephalopathy" (CTE). Some died of complications such as stroke, but others took their own lives. The research continues to link this degenerative disease with football playing directly, but there is no doubt huge cause for concern. Last week, two economists wrote an article for ESPN's Grantland about how this link could lead to the demise of the NFL, and it isn't all that far-fetched.
First of all, I would encourage anyone to read the whole article, these guys aren't regular sportswriters throwing crap at the wall and see what sticks, this is a well-thought out argument backed by numbers and economic analysis.
For starters, consider the idea that the NFL is too big and too powerful to ever fully disappear:
If you look at the stocks in the Fortune 500 from 1983, for example, 40 percent of those companies no longer exist. The original version of Napster no longer exists, largely because of lawsuits. No matter how well a business matches economic conditions at one point in time, it's not a lock to be a leader in the future, and that is true for the NFL too. Sports are not immune to these pressures. In the first half of the 20th century, the three big sports were baseball, boxing, and horse racing, and today only one of those is still a marquee attraction.
That right there is a pretty sound argument. Just the idea that football would ever really disappear makes me shudder with fear. I'd have to invest myself more fully in a sport like baseball or something.
They continue by pointing out that the most likely case for the end of football is lawsuits; eventually if there is any kind of definitive link players, both college and professional and even possibly high schoolers, would start winning lawsuits and eventually bleed the NFL dry by taking their money and players, through the course of schools dropping football for fear of lawsuits and thus taking away the NFL's athlete supply.
This slow death march could easily take 10 to 15 years. Imagine the timeline. A couple more college players — or worse, high schoolers — commit suicide with autopsies showing CTE. A jury makes a huge award of $20 million to a family. A class-action suit shapes up with real legs, the NFL keeps changing its rules, but it turns out that less than concussion levels of constant head contact still produce CTE. Technological solutions (new helmets, pads) are tried and they fail to solve the problem. Soon high schools decide it isn't worth it. The Ivy League quits football, then California shuts down its participation, busting up the Pac-12. Then the Big Ten calls it quits, followed by the East Coast schools. Now it's mainly a regional sport in the southeast and Texas/Oklahoma.
Then they go on to explain the socioeconomic impact of the loss of football; spoiler alert; the city of Green Bay would be in a lot of trouble.
But before anyone starts thinking that this is so scary it will happen, I like to think that it is ultimately too unlikely.
Yes, CTE is a very real disease and there is certainly cause to think that these NFL players killing themselves is hardly just coincidence, I believe that the awareness that is being raised is a very good thing.
The NFL has finally dropped the charade of "what concussions?" and seems to be actively trying to make the safety better, through rules and investing in research.
Guys like Ray Lewis and James Harrison can leave the game if they think it's "wussification" to take away big hits. Go ahead and let your brain become Swiss cheese, I say. There is too much hanging in the balance.
I believe that the awareness of this problem is the biggest thing that could save the game. With awareness comes research, ideas and rules that will help the game become safer.
Look at auto racing; in the 1950s, '60s, '70s and even into the '80s, it wasn't uncommon to have multiple deaths in a racing season, but now it's a lot more rare with the invention of better safety equipment like the HANs device, five-point seat belts and safer race tracks.
When awareness is raised there are more solutions brought forward. I don't think we have to worry about football being gone anytime soon. I believe that we can learn from the dark death of a Dave Duerson and remember his legacy and make the game safer for future generations.
There is too much at stake. It's more than just a sport.
23 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
It's definitely an interesting read
The scenario sounds outlandish because of how big a business football has become, but that doesn’t mean football is immune to backlash, criticism, and/or lawsuits that could impact it long-term. Its doubtful that in twenty years football will look the same with the emergence of new tech. in concussion-prevention and equipment (although I doubt it’d look the same anyway).
If its free, take two.
Then you look at hockey too,
which has had one of their biggest stars – Crosby – play in less than 20 games the last year or two thanks to a concussion.
Weekend contributor and official editorial lackey/waitstaff at Windy City Gridiron
If a people-avoiding gaming hermit is on Twitter, I should be too. Follow me!
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 13, 2012 11:48 AM CST up reply actions
True
but while hockey is undoubtedly a violent sport, I don’t think it compares when talking about concussions. Football involves 22 men on the field with about half of them viciously colliding into one another each an every play. Hockey is physical grueling and has way too many gruesome injuries, but the rate of concussions and possibility of concussions is not as high as in football.
If its free, take two.
by T.J. Shouse on Feb 13, 2012 12:12 PM CST up reply actions
In a lot of ways, the impulse in both sports...
are similar (like in kg/m comparisons) because of the relative speed and stopping distances especially in checking.
I wouldn’t say that concussions are more likely in hockey or football without anyone actually producing authoritative numbers for the amount of concussions. There’s just no evidence. I’m not saying it to be like ‘oh hockey’s more violent’, I don’t really care.
Concussion prevention is the next big step in keeping football a brand. I couldn’t see it any other way.
Five foot three seems to thrive on his misery...
by awfullyquiet on Feb 13, 2012 1:05 PM CST up reply actions
And in hockey, you have 12 on the ince, all 12 (well, 11) of whom can be viciously colliding into one another all the time.
It might be a similar rate, given boards and hard ice.
Weekend contributor and official editorial lackey/waitstaff at Windy City Gridiron
If a people-avoiding gaming hermit is on Twitter, I should be too. Follow me!
by Steven Schweickert on Feb 13, 2012 4:23 PM CST up reply actions
preposterous
"I'm too drunk to taste this chicken" - Colonel Sanders
It's all about THE []_[] baby!!!
~"Smile when u being attacked,laugh when they talking boutcha,wave when they hating on u and Pray when they leave u alone Somethings wrong!"~ Deion Sanders
At least FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER before you judge me fool
these guys know the risks when they sign up
no one is making people play football. they want to. its never going to be a safe sport. letting people know the LT consequences is all you should have to do while trying to make equipment safer.
I know someone here pointed out the Rugby policy of removing safety equipment, I just forget who.
But it’s something I’d like to see done. Remove helmets, pads, and armor. Make any hit above the shoulders not only a penalty, but attach a fine to it of a single game-day check as well.
When you go to somebody's house, you don't crap on their floor. Being a fan of one team does NOT give you license to be a dick to fans of another.
Corollary: When people are visiting your house and behaving themselves, them being a fan of a different team is NOT a reason for you to piss in their beer.
Come add to my future suffering at http://www.skullsfortots.com
by Robert Rence on Feb 13, 2012 11:43 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
I think that’s the right thing to do, and rugby is proving that you can tackle without the pads, pretty safe too.
by transylvanian bear on Feb 13, 2012 1:49 PM CST up reply actions
Probably me, and I was expanding on Ditka’s response on how to make the game safer (“Take away the helmets”). There was a special teams / backup linebacker for someone this season who lost his helmet chasing down a kickoff return, but went ahead and rammed his unprotected head into the returner’s helmet. I watched that and wondered to myself why he didn’t, you know, tackle the guy?
When I assume, I'm not "making an ass out of u and me"... I'm actually putting u between me and an ass.
Brian Braman of the Houston Texans
It may have been a silly move, but the guy truly is a monster
by brightshinies on Feb 17, 2012 1:09 AM CST up reply actions
When it comes to 'safety equipment'
Helmets don’t need to be hardened shells.
Pads don’t need to be three inches thick with hardened plates.
As noted on the Score today, amateur boxers use much less in the helmet department and spend their day getting punched in the head and when’s the last time you heard about an amateur boxer getting a concussion?
I’d love to see them switch to rugby style helmets and James Harrison can whine all he wants.
[...]when Giants coach Steve Owen, a certified defensive genius, was asked how he planned to stop Nagurski, he said: "With a shotgun, as he’s leaving the dressing room."
by NobodySpecial on Feb 14, 2012 1:55 PM CST up reply actions
I don’t think rugby helmets are really there to protect from skull-to-skull impact (which is very rare) so much as they are to prevent studs from drawing blood, when you’re trapped at the bottom of a ruck and boots are coming in. They’ve become much less prevalent now that rigorous rucking has been all but eliminated from the game.
When I assume, I'm not "making an ass out of u and me"... I'm actually putting u between me and an ass.
Boxing has had its longtime issues with head injuries and consequences as well.
"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win."
by GriggsBriggs on Feb 14, 2012 10:22 PM CST up reply actions
i wouldnt be citing boxers for their healthy brains
by TR MacReady on Feb 14, 2012 11:03 PM CST up reply actions
Agreed
I’m not really sure what you were trying to accomplish with that comparison
by brightshinies on Feb 17, 2012 1:11 AM CST up reply actions
I think this problem ranges from a variety of factors
Look at the personalities of the majority of these men. Think about the personalities of the high school/college football players you’ve either seen or met or have been friends with. Most of us guys just get an adrenaline pump when you lay down a massive hit and it feels great, awesome really. That’s just the nature of it, it’s a physical game. But there’s other easier ways to prevent this.
I feel like the introduction of these highly structured helmets, pads, etc. give these guys the tools to lay out a big hit. Should we take out that equipment? Probably not, because we’ll probably end up with more injuries on top of the mass of injuries that the game already has. I think really though it kind of comes down to coaching the right technique. You don’t need to run full bore and straight up into a guy to take him out. Everybody that played football as a kid remembers their coaches screaming out to get low and drive into him. You rarely see that in the pro and college level anymore, even in high school ball for that matter. If you get low and get a guy positioned right, your chances of taking a knock to the head and getting a concussion reduces greatly. You can also look at the fact that a lot of guys out there just want to play as much as they can, and any sign of a concussion, they will probably just ignore it if they don’t personally go and get medical treatment for it.
I like the comparison to auto racing though. For awhile those guys would drive around going 150+ mph and only be wearing like one or two point harnesses and an open face helmet, or no helmet at all even. In old F1 cars you basically sat straight up in the car and if you hit a wall at that speed, you had a great chance of snapping your neck or just being launched from the car in general. After Ayrton Senna passed, they went to great lengths to not only introduce a full six-point harness and head and neck restraints, but also repositioned the driver so he was almost basically laying down in the car, reducing the forces that would send your head and neck forward. There hasn’t been a driver death since in F1.
I don’t think that the game will disappear, football is a huge part of American sports and popular culture. But the game itself probably needs some drastic safety changes like those of F1 in order to lower those concussion numbers, and other injuries in general really.
UMD Bulldogs: 2011 NCAA DI Men's Hockey Nat'l Champions; 2008 & 2010 NCAA DII Football Nat'l Champions
I feel like the introduction of these highly structured helmets, pads, etc. give these guys the tools to lay out a big hit. Should we take out that equipment? Probably not, because we’ll probably end up with more injuries on top of the mass of injuries that the game already has.
Initially, yes, until the culture of hitting changes. You give someone a helmet to protect them from injury, they’re going to use it to lay out the big hit because they can.
When I assume, I'm not "making an ass out of u and me"... I'm actually putting u between me and an ass.
"demise of football" - what does this mean?
The phrase needs to be defined before anyone can come up with an answer.
If you mean could American football as we know it disappear? Yes, and I think it is inevitable.
I can see it going as far as a flag football league. Having said that, I believe it will fall short of flag football and end up where you can tackle but without any contact resulting in impact, such as hitting with the shoulder.
"Losers always whine about their best. Winners go home and f**k the prom queen."
Great post Sam
When Mike Ditka calculates pi it's decimal representation ends. | @wiltfongjr
by Lester A. Wiltfong Jr. on Feb 13, 2012 1:43 PM CST reply actions
Almost any institution can die...
…when the ability to profit from it goes away. Though unlikely, because they are making assumptions like equipment advances can’t severely curb some of this, it’s not impossible. If the risk/cost of lawsuits and public outrage outpace the ability to profit from the sport… then yes… even football can go away.

by 





















