The Motivation of Rex
This could be seen as just another Bears spin on a bad subject, but this isn't the first time that Grossman has freely admitted to there being a problem. Not too long ago during Grossman's 'bad' stretch he told reporters that he didn't know what was wrong, which to a playoff team isn't good. Luckily, the coaches seemed to know and got him turned around. Now this. After the Packers loss, Grossman said he did not prepare properly. The game meant nothing and he didn't put his all into it.
Not that it has to be a big deal, but the fact remains that a decision has still not been made on Grossman as our franchise QB, so things like this really need to be kept behind closed locker rooms.
''[Grossman's] still a young player,'' Turner said, ''and he's still learning the intensity and the preparation and everything that goes along with it and that you have to have that every week. But he wasn't the only one who didn't play well.''
If there is concern that Grossman's poor work habits will carry over into preparation for the divisional playoff game next weekend at Soldier Field, no one was letting on.
''He came out today and threw the ball like he never threw a pick,'' wide receiver Muhsin Muhammad said. ''I've got the same confidence I had in him when he had some bad games earlier. He went on a stretch where he was playing really well, had another bad game. If you follow the trends, he should be able to come back with some good games.''
With two weeks to get Grossman's head straight I have no doubt he will be ready to play, the question is just how well is he going to play.
0 recs |
24 comments
Comments
yeah
by mike b on Jan 4, 2007 9:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sure it does
by Adam T on Jan 4, 2007 9:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i don't know
by mike b on Jan 4, 2007 9:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
why?
Why is it a big deal when Rex says it, but not when Urlacher says it?
by big_lowitzki on Jan 4, 2007 10:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I don't know maybe
by Adam T on Jan 4, 2007 10:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So?
Why is it okay for your best player and repeat pro-bowler to not be focused, but not your young quarterback?
Sure...Urlacher didn't throw 3 int (nice strawman though), but the defense sure hasn't played well, and he is the leader of that defense.
by big_lowitzki on Jan 4, 2007 12:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I haven't followed the games...
Just curious.
There's a difference between saying it's hard to focus and still focusing and playing well and saying it's hard focusing and saying you just didn't prepare well and then being horrible.
by tyger1147 on Jan 4, 2007 10:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he has played okay
by big_lowitzki on Jan 5, 2007 9:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I had a feeling
by mike on Jan 4, 2007 10:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
focus
by jrm78 on Jan 4, 2007 11:20 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Life is funny...
Life is funny
by Chad on Jan 4, 2007 12:38 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'm sorry...
A home game, against your biggest rival, and you decide not to prepare?? The fans deserve better than that. I know the game didn't "mean anything", but at this point every game should mean something to Rex since his job security is quarter to quarter by now...
by Thesportsguru on Jan 5, 2007 9:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Acceptable or not
by Adam T on Jan 5, 2007 9:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Job security?
And again, why is it okay for your starting middle linebacker to say something very similar, but not your starting quarterback?
by big_lowitzki on Jan 5, 2007 11:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The dumbass
At least we didn't choke at home against a non-playoff team in a must-win game, like some teams.
by thecubreporter on Jan 5, 2007 1:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Achem...
cough -Dallas Cowboys- cough
by Chad on Jan 5, 2007 1:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was replying
4 fumbles (only lost two the lucky bastard), 1 Int for the Pro-Bowler and 3 straight losses at home in important games. Dude's a keeper, no doubt.
But he gets to bang Carrie Underwood so all is good for him...
by thecubreporter on Jan 5, 2007 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't wait...
by Chad on Jan 5, 2007 2:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Awwww...
(Plus: "fart in the wind"... Shawshank, no?)
by Danimal on Jan 5, 2007 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not sure...
by Chad on Jan 5, 2007 5:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it's definitely in Shawshank
by mike on Jan 6, 2007 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe it's just me
Don't DB's just have to watch his eyes? Appears to me he has only ONE receiver in mind, for each play and damn it -- he's getting the ball no matter what. 2nd, 3rd options -- forget it.
Rex still seems to be more effective when he performs play-action, but he is still only looking at one intended target.
Perhaps this has been addressed elsewhere, and I haven't seen it.
by San Diego Smooth Jazz Man on Jan 5, 2007 8:40 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Disagree...
by Chad on Jan 5, 2007 10:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 



















